My PhD Thesis Overview: Adaptivity. Your Suggestions Very Welcome!!!
By Taivo Lints on Friday 8 December 2006, 23:50 - Permalink
Goal of the project: to find out the properties and processes that make systems adaptive.
Project status: collecting background information. I am (as of Dec 2006) in the first half of the 2nd year (of the total of 4) of my PhD studies. 1st year was mostly spent on taking courses.
1. What
Adaptation in general is a process through which a system restores, maintains or increases its fitness when outer and inner environments change, or increases its fitness in a nonchanging environment. Adaptation can be observed:
- at different levels: single individual (or nonbiological object, or part of an organism), a group (or a small number of objects), society (or a huge number of objects);
- at different time scales: short periods (compared to individual's lifetime), individual's lifetime, species' lifetime (if it can be determined, as species are usually in a constant change), and even longer periods;
- etc.
My thesis, in its currently very general formulation, is: "The properties and processes causing adaptivity in various systems are similar (when described at a suitable level of abstraction), or at least form a small number of different classes.".
Keywords related to the thesis: adaptivity, learning, flexibility, elasticity, plasticity, context-dependency/-dependence, context-awareness, self-organization, (self-)adjustability, (self-)reconfigurability, feedback, resilience, evolution, conformance, ...
2. Why
The phenomenon of adaptivity is obviously quite widely studied in various systems. However, I have not been able to find any good interdisciplinary, yet thorough, source giving a well-systematized overview of adaptation in different kinds of systems and of underlying processes of adaptation in specific cases and in general (note: there are good materials on adaptation as an evolutionary process, but I am using the term adaptation in a much more general sense here). Possible reasons for not finding such a source:
- I have not searched well enough? In that case this source must be quite hard to find and is likely to be missed by many other searchers, too, as I have already done at least medium level searches from databases of scientific papers, from amazon.com and from elsewhere in the web. I do continue searching, of course: if not to find THE source, then at least to find numerous existing works on adaptation in specific fields of study.
- The generalizations are impossible to make? This is not very likely as at least some generalizations HAVE been made. For example the notion of evolution can be used to describe slow adaptation in biological species as well as, for example, in the ideas moving around in a society (as suggested by memetics theory), and it is used as an inspiration for genetic algorithms. Also, cybernetics has pointed out a general process important for adaptation, namely the feedback. Of course, it can be wondered whether there would be any use for very broad generalizations at all, as Kenneth Boulding says (Boulding, 1956): "... we always pay for generality by sacrificing content, and all we can say about practically everything is almost nothing.". But he immediately continues: "Somewhere however between the specific that has no meaning and the general that has no content there must be, for each purpose and at each level of abstraction, an optimum degree of generality.". For the work on adaptation to have the biggest value, therefore, it should probably present in a systematic way the information characterizing adaptation at different levels of abstraction: starting from specific examples and going through various levels of abstraction (possibly in several parallel paths) up to the general notion of adaptivity.
- Such an overview is just not written yet, though it would be possible, and very useful for understanding and creating adaptive systems? Considering the preceding discussion I find this the most probable reason for not finding the aforementioned thorough source. Therefore, creating a work analyzing and systematizing the adaptation processes of various systems seems to be, in my opinion, well justified.
3. How
Methods of doing my work will likely include:
- Studying many different kinds of adaptation by reading articles, books, web sources, talking with (knowledgeable) people, experimenting in silico and otherwise.
- Contacting specialists of different disciplines for finding out their views on the topic, what adaptation means in their field of work and asking for reading suggestions. There is a very large number of potentially relevant fields. To name just a few: biology, ecology, psychology, anthropology, culturology, linguistics, urbanistics, art, marketing, cybernetics, artificial life, etc., etc., etc.
- Identifying the underlying causes and mechanisms of adaptation processes; systematizing and generalizing them onto different levels of abstraction.
- Suggesting applications for the results and possibly creating a few example applications myself.
4. Your Help Welcome!
If you have any comments or ideas about my work and about the topic in general, or any suggestions about what I should read (references to articles, books, web pages, etc.) or whom I might find interesting / useful to contact, then please let me know! You can post a comment directly here or send me an e-mail (find the up-to-date mail address at taivo.net.
If you know anybody who might be interested in reading this blog entry and giving me suggestions, then please send them a link to this page!
5. References
Boulding, K. E., 1956: "General Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science," in Management Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1956, pp. 197-208. Reprint (with an introduction by Kurt A. Richardson) in Emergence: Complexity and Organization, Vol. 6, No 1-2, 2004, pp. 127-139. http://emergence.org/ECO_site/web-content/ECO_6_1-2.html
Comments
And how is it going now? :)
Well, I kind of start understanding what the word "adaptation" means :) And am in the process of understanding the underlying properties and processes that support it. The plan is to get the draft of the thesis writeup ready this year.
How would you sum up how your ideas and understanding of adaptation have change since you started this journey?
I should know better than to ask that question really, but it sounds quite positive including things you've said elsewhere. Things that are worth doing take time. I wish you all the best with the writing up!
@Tali: Hmm... difficult to sum up yet. Well, from the definition side, I have started to understand that there are a few main somewhat distinct perspectives at what adaptation as such is (one stemming from evolution theory, one from cybernetics, one being the general common everyday usage, and one the usage in psychology and related fields) and I have developed my own working definition (subject to further improvements, of course): "adaptation as a process is apparently about changing something (itself, others, the environment) so that it would be more suitable or fit for some purpose than it would have otherwise been" and I consider it (inspired by Lotfi A. Zadeh) to be a relative concept that requires further specification of frames of reference: behaving adaptively with regard to which (possibly implicit) goal(s), in which environments, within which time frames, and so on (i.e., just saying that something is adaptive, without further explanations, doesn't really give very much information, except maybe when the frames of reference are obvious).
@Sarah: Thanks! And I wish I'd be spending more of my time on actually working on it and other important projects :) (sighs and goes grabs the Focus book from the bookshelf again)